1
00:00:00,300 --> 00:00:05,010
All right it's time to write the limitations section, which is usually not the most fun because we need

2
00:00:05,010 --> 00:00:10,470
to talk about the things that were bad in our research. But actually, even the limitations section can

3
00:00:10,470 --> 00:00:16,170
be a section in which you can truly impress your readers by showing the reader that you understand the

4
00:00:16,170 --> 00:00:20,340
limitations of your study very well and that you're very honest about that.

5
00:00:20,610 --> 00:00:25,530
And if the reader is already impressed by the value that you're providing with your research then that

6
00:00:25,530 --> 00:00:32,190
will be the cherry on the cake. And as I already said before very often the limitations are a separate

7
00:00:32,190 --> 00:00:33,830
section with separate heading.

8
00:00:33,870 --> 00:00:35,840
Just as for the implications.

9
00:00:36,060 --> 00:00:37,540
But again that is up to you.

10
00:00:37,590 --> 00:00:42,410
You can structure your discussion section in whatever way you think makes sense.

11
00:00:42,490 --> 00:00:42,740
Okay.

12
00:00:42,750 --> 00:00:48,390
So the first goal in the limitation section is quite obviously to state the limitations of your study

13
00:00:48,630 --> 00:00:51,170
or at least the most important ones.

14
00:00:51,180 --> 00:00:57,690
So common expressions you find here are: "Our study has two main limitations. First,...

15
00:00:57,930 --> 00:01:09,550
Second,..." and so on. "The most important limitation is that...". "Another limitation is that...". So it's quite straightforward.

16
00:01:09,590 --> 00:01:17,270
And limitations you can think of are all kinds of things. You can think of confounds, unreliable measurements,

17
00:01:17,810 --> 00:01:24,260
unrepresentative samples, correlational designs that do not allow you to draw conclusions about causality,

18
00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:30,140
or just in general conclusions that you canNOT draw from your findings. Conclusions that a researcher

19
00:01:30,140 --> 00:01:36,290
may WANT to draw from your findings but that you actually CANNOT draw. Or you can think of biases that

20
00:01:36,290 --> 00:01:38,810
arise from participants dropping out.

21
00:01:38,810 --> 00:01:40,240
It depends very much on your study.

22
00:01:40,250 --> 00:01:45,010
But most of the time finding at least one limitation isn't that difficult.

23
00:01:45,020 --> 00:01:50,060
Now, the second goal is - if possible - to also qualify your limitations.

24
00:01:50,060 --> 00:01:55,250
But it is important to only qualify them after you first admitted them.

25
00:01:55,250 --> 00:01:59,840
This is very important because you do not want to give the impression that you're just trying to argue

26
00:01:59,840 --> 00:02:01,590
your limitations away.

27
00:02:01,670 --> 00:02:03,610
So here are some examples.

28
00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:09,160
"Although these alternative explanations of our results cannot be ruled out entirely,

29
00:02:09,260 --> 00:02:15,230
there are two patterns in the results that point towards our primary explanation." See what happens here?

30
00:02:15,260 --> 00:02:22,820
I admit explicitly that there is a valid limitation but then I explain why it may not matter so much.

31
00:02:23,940 --> 00:02:31,530
Or "Although our findings allow for the alternative explanation that X, the results by Devin at all are

32
00:02:31,530 --> 00:02:33,820
in conflict with his explanation.

33
00:02:33,840 --> 00:02:40,830
Taking this into account the more plausible explanation for our finding is..." and so on.

34
00:02:40,830 --> 00:02:44,390
Or "Although the drop out rate was considerable,

35
00:02:44,490 --> 00:02:49,620
we observed no difference between participants who completed our study and participants who dropped

36
00:02:49,620 --> 00:02:50,750
out."

37
00:02:50,820 --> 00:02:56,700
So what I want you to notice here is that each of these sentences starts by admitting the limitation.

38
00:02:57,330 --> 00:03:01,740
So be sure that even if you have good arguments against your limitation that you don't just argue it

39
00:03:01,740 --> 00:03:03,030
away right away.

40
00:03:03,030 --> 00:03:09,120
First make very very clear to your reader that you admit your limitation. Okay so that's how you write about

41
00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:10,080
limitations.

42
00:03:10,080 --> 00:03:16,500
Again you can find more expressions in the "discussion outline and writing template" and in the next lecture

43
00:03:16,500 --> 00:03:21,660
we're gonna talk about writing the summary and conclusions section at the very end of your discussion

44
00:03:21,660 --> 00:03:22,050
section.
